Playtech Pulls Games From California Sweepstakes Amid Legal Tensions

As debate over the legality of sweepstakes casinos in California intensifies, another leading supplier has stepped away from the market. Playtech, a well-established content and technology provider, confirmed it has stopped offering its titles and services to sweepstakes operators in the state.

A Playtech spokesperson  SBC Americas, “We continually assess our position across jurisdictions, taking into account a range of factors. We are not supplying social gaming operators on sweepstakes in California at this time.” The company emphasized that future decisions would continue to be made on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, weighing market conditions and consulting with operating partners.

The decision was first noticed by players when titles disappeared from major sweepstakes platforms. Both VGW—owner of Chumba Casino and LuckyLand Slots—and McLuck confirmed Playtech’s games were no longer available in California. “We can confirm that games provided by Playtech – a third-party games supplier – are no longer available for our players in California,” a VGW spokesperson said. The company apologized for the disruption, stressing that it still maintains “a positive relationship with Playtech” but remains focused on in-house development to ensure a wide library of exclusive content.

Chumba Casino’s removal of Playtech titles included popular slots such as Tsai Shen’s Gift Fire Blaze, Mega Fire Blaze: Big Circus, and Oink Oink Oink. In addition, attempts to access Playtech’s Live Blackjack within California now return an “unavailable” message. These changes highlight how providers and operators alike are making rapid adjustments in response to regulatory uncertainties.

Attorney Jeff Ifrah noted on X that Playtech is the “4th supplier to pull its games from sweepstakes casinos,” underscoring the broader pattern of suppliers leaving the U.S. market under mounting scrutiny.

Playtech’s exit follows a series of supplier withdrawals tied to lawsuits and regulatory pressure in California.  it would no longer work with sweepstakes casinos anywhere in the United States. Its decision came after being named in a lawsuit filed by Los Angeles City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto against Stake.us and a group of content partners, including Evolution and Hacksaw Gaming. The complaint alleged violations of California gambling and advertising laws.

Following the filing, Evolution, Hacksaw Gaming, and Pragmatic Play all pulled their titles from Stake.us. McLuck, in turn, said it would stop offering Pragmatic Play content starting September 8. Playtech, though not a defendant in the lawsuit, has now taken a similar step by leaving the California sweepstakes space altogether.

Unlike smaller studios that heavily depend on sweepstakes casinos for distribution, Playtech’s broader footprint allows more flexibility. Its presence in regulated U.S. iGaming states—such as New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia—means it can lean on established partnerships with major operators including DraftKings and BetMGM.

These corporate moves coincide with a decisive moment in California’s legislature. Assembly Bill 831 (AB 831), which seeks to ban online sweepstakes casinos, awaits a vote in the Senate.  to clarify its scope, specifically excluding limited-time marketing promotions like those run by Starbucks or McDonald’s. Language was also added to limit liability to entities that “knowingly and intentionally” operate or promote dual-currency sweepstakes platforms.

The bill has backing from powerful gaming tribes, including the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation and the California Nations Indian Gaming Association. Still, opposition has surfaced. VGW’s new partner, the Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation, joined three other tribes in opposing the measure. Publishers Clearing House, now under social gaming ownership, has also spoken out against the proposal. The most recent to voice opposition, the Mechoopda Indians of Chico Rancheria, submitted a formal letter to the Senate on September 3.

Meanwhile, cardroom advocates such as the California Cities Gaming Authority and several municipalities hosting cardrooms have pushed back against AB 831 as well.

With California’s legislative session ending September 12, lawmakers face a tight deadline. If AB 831 is not approved in the coming days, the proposal could be delayed for months, extending uncertainty for sweepstakes operators and their suppliers.

Top casinos in United States

125% up to

$1250

Overall Rating

96

Visit Casino Read Review

300% up to

$3000

Overall Rating

94

Visit Casino Read Review

up to

$/€50

Overall Rating

90

Visit Casino Read Review

The withdrawal of Playtech, alongside Pragmatic Play and others, signals a shifting supplier landscape for sweepstakes casinos in California and beyond. As legal scrutiny increases and legislative efforts advance, operators may need to adapt their portfolios, focusing more heavily on studios dedicated to sweepstakes models. For suppliers with a strong presence in regulated real-money markets, stepping back from sweepstakes appears to be a manageable risk.

For players, the immediate impact is reduced availability of familiar games, though leading operators emphasize their ability to fill the gap with proprietary content. For the industry, the trend underscores how quickly regulatory pressure can reshape business strategies in emerging gaming verticals.

Source:

, x.com/wallachlegal, September 5, 2025.